Circumcision: I Changed My Mind

By Kelly McLane © 2011


When I was preparing for the birth of my first child, there was only one thing I knew I did not want - an episiotomy. I wanted to try to give birth without drugs but I was open to an epidural if needed. I wanted to try laboring in water. I wanted to try breastfeeding but wasn't sure if it would work for me. So when it came time to push and I heard my midwife say, "Let's try a couple more pushes and then we might have to CUT..." I gathered up every bit of strength I had and pushed my baby out even though I couldn't feel anything because I had an epidural. I knew I did NOT want her to cut me down there. It seems ironic now that shortly after birth, I handed my baby boy over to be circumcised.

Before I get started, I want to emphasize that I am not writing this with the intent of making any parent feel bad or guilty about their decision to circumcise a son - what's done is done. I have friends and family that chose circumcision and I do not judge their decision, we all do the best we can with the information we have at the time. I am a very proud mama of three amazing boys - my first son was circumcised but the next two boys were not. I am sharing my story with compassion and hope for all the baby boys not yet born, that maybe by sharing my story, I can save *just one* baby from the unnecessary pain and harm of this procedure. I recognize that this is a very controversial, extremely sensitive, and culturally taboo subject but I have learned that, for most people, the more a person knows about circumcision, the more they are against it and I will always wish that I had been better informed before I had my first baby boy.

I was raised Catholic in North Dakota with two sisters and no brothers. I do not remember ever seeing my father naked so I honestly do not know whether he was circumcised or not. I would guess yes because he was born in the 50s when many baby boys were circumcised, often without consent from their parents. The topic of circumcision never came up in my family. To tell you the truth, I naively assumed a circumcised penis was the way boys were born. With that assumption I can't say for certain if any of my sexual partners were circumcised or not because up until I found out I was pregnant with a baby boy I really had no clue about normal male anatomy.

In 2004 I was pregnant, and we found out our baby was a BOY! The decision to circumcise or not came up right away. I did all the research and came to the conclusion that I did not want to circumcise our son. I believe at that time I likely found out more than the average U.S. parent discovers. I learned that circumcision is painful, harmful, and medically unnecessary. I learned that no medical organization in the world recommends routine infant circumcision, not even the American Academy of Pediatrics. I learned what the procedure entails and I watched a video and had to mute the sound, no way did I want my baby to go through that. I shared what I had learned with my husband hoping he would agree with me.

Unfortunately, he did not. It wasn't even a decision for him, it was going to be done no matter what I said. We argued. I shared the information with him, I showed him the video, but his mind was already made up. It was closed actually. For him, it was a simple procedure that newborn boys went through, much like cutting the umbilical cord. Until then, he had not given much thought to being circumcised as a baby, but felt that he was just fine the way he was, so his son would be too. In the end, I foolishly gave in. I didn't protect my baby even though my maternal instinct screamed to do so. I let my husband choose circumcision for our son because he has a circumcised penis and I don't.

However, I had to justify this decision in some way - I couldn't just let it happen knowing what I knew. I didn't care about percentages, I've never really been one to do what everybody else was doing. And at that time the circumcision rate in the U.S. was about 50% - so half were keeping their sons intact, and half weren't. Even though some people claim a circumcised penis "looks better" that didn't make sense to me. How could I possibly think my baby's body was ugly or defective?! I am not a religious person and even though my husband is Jewish we do not practice Judaism so there was no religious reason. So I grabbed onto the one study that claimed circumcised babies have a slightly lower chance of urinary tract infections. My husband has a kidney disease that has a 50% chance of being passed down. Bingo. We circumcised our baby because IF he has this kidney disease, then we should do whatever we can to reduce the chance of a urinary tract infection which could potentially harm the kidneys. That was my reason, my excuse. I insisted that if we were going to circumcise our baby, my husband had to go with him. I did not want him to go through it alone. I was really hoping that this would change his mind, but nope, still just a simple procedure in his eyes. Going with our son actually turned out to be a blessing in disguise later on...

Our perfect and healthy little baby boy was born into this world on April 21st. For some reason, the pediatrician we had chosen wasn't called while I was in labor, so she didn't show up at the hospital until the next day as we were checking out. "What about the circumcision?" my husband asked. "Oh, we'll do it in the office next week," she said, "Call and make an appointment."  I said I was worried about the procedure and she blew me off saying it's no big deal - that I shouldn't worry about it. She also said she was "pro-circ and thinks it should be done." We scheduled the appointment for April 30th. Even though I wish so many times that during that week I had changed my mind, put my foot down, and protected his tiny perfect body, I didn't. The decision had already been made.

Our first son, before circumcision surgery began.

So we took him in. My husband went back with him. It seemed to take forever and a nurse came out at one point. She was laughing the whole thing off and mentioned that I looked "terrified." "Yes, I AM terrified!" I thought, "You people are back there forcefully separating, cutting, and removing a part of my baby's body and it is taking for-freakin-ever!"

They finally brought him out and the doctor informed me that my baby needed a couple stitches, no big deal. I wanted to throw up. My tiny little baby, his perfectly NORMAL body, had stitches in his penis - the most sacred organ. How could I have let this happen and for what reason?! I really, honestly, don't think I will ever forgive myself for letting this happen to him. I knew better. But it did happen and I couldn't change that and so for weeks afterward at every diaper change I fought back tears and apologized to my baby as I gently pulled back and detached the remaining skin that was obviously trying to heal itself and re-cover the glans that, by nature, is designed to be covered.

In 2005 I became pregnant again and we didn't find out the sex this time. The babies would be 16 months apart. At first, my husband was very adamant that if baby #2 was a boy, he would also be circumcised. "They have to match, they have to be the same," he said. I prayed to the universe for a girl, even though I had a good feeling it was another boy. This time though, I was NOT going to give in. Two wrongs do not make a right. Maya Angelou said "When you know better, you do better," and even though I knew in my heart the first time, I wasn't going to make the same mistake twice. I wasn't going to let another baby of mine get stitches in his penis for no reason. I also learned more about the foreskin and what is lost when it is removed and how important and valuable this part of the male genitals is during infancy, childhood, and throughout a man's life. So I told my husband that if he really wanted it done, he would need to call the doctor, make the appointment, and take him in to have it done. Knowing his inability to do these sorts of things (ha!), I felt relieved inside.

Our second son, born at home, and kept whole.

Thankfully, throughout the pregnancy, and as my husband slowly processed his own experience with our first son's circumcision, he was able to see circumcision from a different perspective. I made him tell me what had happened during our son's surgery, even though I didn't want to know. I had to know. We both ended up in tears.

I continued to share facts and information, but this time, we didn't argue about it, it was kind of a non-issue because we didn't know if we were having a boy or girl. Believe it or not, what really sealed the deal for him was watching Penn and Teller's (Season 3) Bullshit! episode on circumcision. What really stood out for him was the historical reason Americans started practicing non-religious genital cutting in the first place. If you don't know, you should definitely find out before making this decision, because it really is bullshit. [Hint: Google Kellogg and Graham and their quest to end masturbation.]

Our second baby, another boy, was born peacefully and naturally at home in the tub. No appointment was made and he was left whole just as nature intended. I remember asking my husband, "What about circumcision?" He said after having an amazing homebirth, he saw no reason to take our healthy and perfectly normal baby to the doctor to have a part of his body cut off. I will admit, I was a little nervous about taking care of an intact baby because I had zero experience with normal male genitals. But as it turns out, it is MUCH easier than taking care of a circumcised baby. I currently have 10+ years of mothering two intact sons (baby #3 was born in 2007 - another boy!) and ZERO urinary tract infections. One time, son #2 was playing outside naked and got poked in the penis by a really nasty weed in the yard. His foreskin swelled up and it was a little scary but his foreskin did its job and protected the very sensitive glans (head) of the penis. If his foreskin had not been there, the glans most likely would have swelled up and prevented him from peeing normally. Hooray for nature and normal body evolution!

So, this is my story. I've experienced both sides of this parenting coin. The heartache and guilt I've felt following my son's circumcision led me to be a voice for baby boys who cannot say NO for themselves. I firmly believe ALL human beings, girls and boys, have a right to their normal, intact genitals. Should an adult man or woman choose circumcision for themselves, as an informed, consenting person - fine by me. But routine infant circumcision is not a compassionate thing to do to a little newborn baby - it hurts, it harms, and there is no good excuse to do it. The foreskin is a very important part of penis! It's his body, it's his penis, and it should be his choice whether or not he wants his full penis - foreskin and all.

One thing I have done and I encourage any parents that regret circumcision to do is to Google the doctor that performed their son's circumcision surgery and leave a review for them. There are several websites out there to do this. We need to let these pro-cutting doctors know that we trusted them to provide us with accurate and unbiased information regarding circumcision and that we are not okay with what they've done to our sons.

A shocking number of doctors in this country have very little knowledge of normal male anatomy. They do not understand the value and functions of the foreskin, they are only taught to amputate it. Our doctor did not give us accurate information, she was completely biased, and we did not give informed consent as we should have been able to do. Let's make sure our physicians receive feedback, and are encouraged to look into this subject more themselves - for the sake of their future patients.

I do not blame the doctor in our case, she only did what she knew. Nor do I blame my husband as he is a victim of circumcision himself. I can only blame myself for not listening to my mama instinct. And I blame our culture for desensitizing us to male genital cutting and allowing it to continue for so long when other English speaking nations abandoned the practice long ago, or never even started cutting babies to begin with.

The good news is we are well on our way to becoming a non-cutting country, like the majority of civilized nations around the world. The infant circumcision rate in the U.S. has dropped to under 35% in recent years, and will only go down from here as more parents learn the truth.

In the future, I will be honest with my circumcised son about what happened to him and make sure that no future grandsons of mine are cut. My husband and I are proud that we protected our 2nd and 3rd sons' autonomy and genital integrity, and once and for all ended the cycle of genital cutting in our family.

Our third son, born at home and kept whole.


If you would like a circumcision, prepuce and intact care information pack, you can request one here. The pack contains a great deal of excellent information to read, as well as 3 DVDs with a variety of informative videos to watch. If you cannot afford the cost of materials or shipping, there is a waiting list for someone else to donate a pack to you, or you can send me a message (InHonorofForest@gmail.com) and I will help get an info pack to you.


To hear from more parents who are raising both circumcised and intact sons, visit Keeping Future Sons Intact on Facebook, and read many of their stories here.

~~~~

Psychology Today Circumcision Series



During the months of September and October, Psychology Today, will be running a six part series on circumcision. Covering commonly held myths in North America, as well as social, sexual, medical and psychological aspects of male genital cutting, and ethical and economic concerns, this series promises to be research-based and up to date. The articles will be published under the direction of Dr. Darcia Narvaez, Ph.D., who serves as an Associate Professor of Psychology, and the Director of the Collaborative for Ethical Education at the University of Notre Dame. We encourage readers to investigate all parts in the series and continue your research to further your education and understanding of male circumcision in North America today.

Psychology Today: Circumcision Series


Part 1: Myths About Circumcision You Likely Believe
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201109/myths-about-circumcision-you-likely-believe


Part 2: More Circumcision Myths You May Believe: Hygiene and STDs
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201109/more-circumcision-myths-you-may-believe-hygiene-and-stds


Part 3: Circumcision: Social, Sexual, Psychological Realities
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201109/circumcision-social-sexual-psychological-realities


Part 4: Circumcision Ethics and Economics
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201109/circumcision-ethics-and-economics


Part 5: What Is the Greatest Danger for an Uncircumcised Boy? http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201110/what-is-the-greatest-danger-uncircumcised-boy


Part 6: Why Continue to Harm Boys from the Ignorance of Male Anatomy
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201110/why-continue-harm-boys-ignorance-male-anatomy


2/7/12 Update: Dr. Gad Saad published a piece with Psychology Today also covering circumcision. See: Male Circumcision and Quality of Sex Life (For Both Sexes)
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/homo-consumericus/201202/male-circumcision-and-quality-sex-life-both-sexes

9/16/12 Update: Dr. Narvaez covers ethical issues in pediatric medicine, pointing out concerns with the crisis in healthy baby sleep and genital autonomy: What Happened to Ethics in Pediatric Medicine? http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/moral-landscapes/201209/what-happened-ethics-in-pediatric-medicine


For books written by Darcia Narvaez, and contact information, find her here at Psychology Today.

Also by Narvaez at DrMomma.org:

Where Are All the Happy Babies?

The Dangers of Crying It Out

Additional information on the prepuce (foreskin), intact care and circumcision at Are You Fully Informed?

Request a circumcision information pack of research materials here.

~~~~

32% of U.S. Baby Boys Circumcised in 2009: A Response to Critics Questioning the CDC Reported Rate

By Danelle Frisbie © 2011



If you're a seasoned reader of Saving Our Sons, you know that last summer (2010) the CDC presented statistics in Vienna at the International AIDS Conference showing the rate of newborn male genital cutting in the United States dropped from 56.2% in 2006 to 32.5% in 2009.

If you run in intactivist circles, you also know that there is a small handful of those who strongly oppose genital cutting, but question the reality of this CDC presented statistic. It is an issue that has surfaced somewhat regularly, and we believe one worth addressing here.

The CDC presented statistic was delivered in an address by Charbel El Bcheraoui, an epidemic intelligence officer in the division of HIV/AIDS with the CDC. When presenting to a largely non-U.S. population, CDC representatives had no trouble standing behind this 32.5% genital cutting rate and suggested we may do ourselves good to increase cutting. At the time, (in conjunction with a few other biased, pro-cutting agencies), they were making attempts to push MGM on adult African men as a "protective measure against HIV" (a proposed "vaccine" of sorts for HIV that we know is bogus).

When media back home in the U.S. picked up on the presented rate (thanks in part to Intact America intactivists at the conference who photographed the presentation slides, and the New York Times publishing a story on the research) it was used by human rights advocates to exemplify that genital cutting is drastically dropping in the U.S. (which it is) and that the old "locker room argument" is out the window. This spin on the stat in the last year seems to have pushed (a pro-cutting) CDC into indifference or passive pro-cutting silence on the most comprehensive statistics and research findings, while using old data (~50% cutting) on their website and invalid methods of securing this stat in recent publications, as current.

If there is any validity to the old statistics (having been presented for almost a decade now), we can know the rate is less than 56% because this figure comes from 2005-2006, and as education on the subject has increased (not only among parents, but among doctors, midwives, doulas, CBEs, lactation consultants, and college professors as well) more boys go home intact. To propose that genital cutting has remained the same for the past 7 years is naive at best, deliberately fabricated to push MGM at worst.

The actual study - which was a meta-analysis (the largest study on newborn circumcision rates in the U.S. to ever be conducted) showed steady decline between 2006-2009. It included genital cutting (i.e. prepuce amputation surgery) that was done during the first 12 months postpartum (1st year of a baby's life) in a hospital or clinic, or when insurance was used, and was therefore recorded as a covered surgical procedure and/or short hospital stay. [Many parents today still do not realize that genital cutting is classified on hospital and insurance documentations as surgery.]

The vast majority of babies cut in the U.S. go under the knife during their first 10 days after birth (most within the first 48 hours). If a baby is not cut until later in their first year, insurance is almost always used because general anesthesia is also recommended -- post 10lbs or 6 months age. [We still seem to buy into the old myth that "newborn babies don't feel pain" and can therefore be cut apart without anesthesia.] Later genital cutting under anesthesia automatically requires insurance to get involved for a surgical procedure that must be documented in hospital or clinic records as such, and billed with anesthesiology. Often, these later procedures are done in the OR which is need for further hospital recording and insurance involvement because there must be "worthy cause" for anesthesia to be used, and an OR to be booked, for an otherwise healthy baby.

Not every hospital and clinic in the U.S. was surveyed - as with most comprehensive and analytical statistics, we take a measurement that represents a valid and reliable percentage of the population, and apply it to the whole. Again, this was the largest study of its kind to ever be conducted, and their results were significant and conclusive.

On a sociological scale then, the only babies who would not be included in this 32.5% stat are:

- those cut at home

- those cut outside a hospital or clinic that documents its surgical procedures and whose cutting is not covered by insurance

This would include Jewish parents opting for a Brit Milah at home. The current population of Jews in the U.S. is approximately 2%. (1, 2)  This means that even if every single Jewish adult had a son during the 2006 year, and every single one of these babies was cut, the rate of newborn circumcision would still only increase to 34.5%. We know this is certainly not the case - less than 50% of babies born are male, (nature tends to favor female offspring), and more Jewish parents today do not cut their sons, but instead elect for a Brit Shalom, or pass on the ceremony altogether. Some of the most outspoken intactivists today are Jewish men, women, rabbis, physicians, historians, etc. Obviously, the number of those cut within Judaism is not going to have a dramatic impact on the overall national rate. In nations today where all boys and men remain intact from birth except those born within Jewish families, the male genital cutting rate is still 1-2%.

The other population this CDC presented rate does not take into account includes boys born at home. Today the numbers of women who choose to birth at home is much less than the population of Jewish adults in our country. The National Vital Statistics Reports and CDC report that 0.59% of births in 2006 were at home (1/2 a percent!) and all of the births that took place outside the hospital were only 0.90% (still less than 1%). We do not have current 2009 statistics on the percentage of babies born at home (at least not that which has been published by the CDC / NVSR) but other research shows the rate of birth outside the hospital has stayed fairly steady - around 1% for the past 25 years. It is very unlikely that homebirth would statistically, significantly higher in 2009 (when genital cutting was found to have dropped). In addition, more often those who are opting to birth at home are well-informed women making choices based on health-conscious and well researched reasons. They are more likely to take an active role in protecting both themselves, their birth, and their baby. The rate of genital cutting tends to be lower among families birthing at home. But for argument's sake, let's say that the rate of home birth doubled between 2006 and 2009 -- up from 0.59% to 1.19% and that all of those women birthed boys... (again about 46% of live births are actually male) and all of those baby boys were cut. This would still only increase the 32.5% to 33.5%. Just as we find with Judaism, homebirth is not having a dramatic impact on the national average of MGM.

If we combined all the male babies born to Jewish parents (<1%), and all the male babies born at home (<0.29%), and assumed they were all circumcised in their first 12 months of life, this still only increases that 32.5% to 33.79%.

Others argue that there are babies who are (1) not cut in the hospital and (2) not covered by insurance and (3) not born to Jewish parents, but are still later cut in one way or another during their 1st year in life. It is very possible that there are infant boys who fall under all of these qualifiers, who also end up with parents that save up the money needed to have them cut in a private clinic, (or do so themselves at home with a box cutter and are never caught), in a time and place where surgical procedures are not recorded, and insurance is never taken. But the percentage of those who fit this category? Not very high... How many babies do YOU know who were cut in such a fashion? The vast majority (if they are going to do so) circumcise their newborn baby son within the first 10 days of life, and most of these prepuce amputation surgeries take place within a hospital or clinical setting. While we strive for the day when all non-medical genital cutting on minors, regardless of sex, will be against the law, and none of our tax dollars will fund MGM, the reality is that Medicaid continues to fund circumcision as well in the majority of states.

If the CDC comes at this issue from a pro-cutting stance while presenting information in the U.S., and then fudge their own research in order to respond to the "backlash of intactivism," that is one thing. But let's recognize the manipulation of stats and negligence of facts (re. intact health, proper prepuce care, destruction and risk of genital cutting, etc.) for what its worth.

The rate of genital cutting in 2011 is certainly even lower than it was two years ago in 2009. The percentage of families with older boys who were cut, and babies born this year who will remain intact, is soaring, thanks to grassroots efforts to get parents (both new and experienced) accurate and complete intact information. The recent rise of intact sons is also due in part to the media exposure of the San Francisco MGM Bill, stirring people nationwide who never thought about this issue before to look into it for the first time. As the saying goes, "The more you know..." And this rise in intact children is thanks in part to an increasing number of celebrities who are speaking out and raising awareness among a younger generation of new parents. Today more and more physicians, doulas, midwives, CBEs, lactation consultants, child development professors, and others working with expecting parents include intact information and care items in their intake folders, meetings, and classrooms.

MGM is decreasing.

Whether the actual national rate in 2011 is 28% or 32%, or even 10% higher at 42% - the majority of boys today remain intact, and the rate of genital cutting continues to plummet. What it actually was in 2009, we may never know. And it truly does not even matter. Where exactly that percentage lies today should not be the primary focus of our work. Rather, let's do what we need to do to ensure that next parent we meet has the information they need to make a fully informed decision, and that the next ONE single baby boy born within your circle of influence has parents who are well equipped to take their whole baby home.


References:

1) Ira M. Sheskin and Arnold Dashefsky, “Jewish Population of the United States, 2006,” in the American Jewish Year Book 2006, Volume 106.

2) David Singer and Lawrence Grossman, Editors. NY: American Jewish Committee, 2006.


In spirit of the season, Christina of Intact Iowa
shares this photo of her son in his "Cut Pumpkins. Not Babies." tshirt from Made By Momma.

*******



AB 768 Hearing: California Lawmakers Push Forced Genital Cutting on Babies


Image courtesy of the Barefoot Intactivist
Still photos from physician's circumcision training video here.


Hearing Footage Part One: 


Hearing Footage Part Two: 



Related Reading: 

Legislative Analysis of the Bill *Note this analysis is full of myths, half-truth, and corrupt propositions and declarations that are not research based in the least. It shows just how pro-cutting the legislative board is.

AB 768 Press Conference

AB 768 Committee Hearing

California Politicians Make False Claims - Write the Governor

Foreskin-Restoration Thread

AB 768 Approved

Bill Passes to Protect Genital Cutting


Communities:

Legalize Foreskin California

California: CHANGE Chapter

San Francisco MGM Bill

Bay Area Intactivists 

NOCIRC (chapters throughout California)

Assemblyman Mike Gatto's Facebook Page - page admins continue to remove pro-intact comments and research based discussion, so save a copy of what you write before posting.

Volunteer in your state with the MGM Bill.

Start a Peaceful Parenting Network chapter in your community and host meet-ups, workshops, and film nights on intact information.

Help administer your state's Whole Network chapter.


~~~~

Intact or Circumcised: A Significant Difference in the Adult Penis

By Danelle Day, Ph.D. © 2011







******





NOTICE:

The images below are graphic in nature for the purpose of education.
They may not be suitable for viewing in the workplace.
Saving Our Sons takes a strong position against all forms of violence and aggression toward all babies and children. Through education we strive to make the world a more peace-filled place.






*******


The penis and clitoris are analogous and homologous organs: they perform similar functions, share a common design, and biologically develop from the same tissues inutero. The glans (head) of the penis or clitoris is an internal organ. It is meant to remain covered for the majority of its livelihood, in similar nature to the way that the eyeballs are covered for a good portion of our lives (when we blink or sleep), and the way the ends of our fingers and toes are protected by our nails.

If we surgically amputate the eyelids or fingernails, we will face the repercussions of making an organ that was designed to be internal, external. In order to survive this damage, the organ must adapt. To do so, a variety of features will change (both immediately, and progressively over the years): pH will be altered, temperature will no longer remain stable in that organ, moisture and lubrication levels will not be maintained, leading to dryness and potential chapping, antibodies and healthy microflora that previously served to protect will cease to exist, and callusing (the build-up of multiple hardened layers of skin) will take place. Our body may attempt to heal itself by forming skin bridges or re-adhesions over the amputation site. Our eyeballs and fingertips would become thick, dry, discolored, and no longer function in the manner they were designed to.

So it is the same with the glans of the penis or clitoris. If we remove the very organ, the prepuce, which serves to cover, protect and regulate the health, pH, temperature, lubrication, antibodies, movement and functioning of the genitals, we've altered form so dramatically that the purposes it was created to fulfill can no longer be realized.

Not only is this evident in research: human development and sexuality especially, but the dramatic difference is also readily apparent to any lay onlooker observing the intact human genitals versus those that no longer remain in their original whole state.

Female and male genital cutting, especially in the manner that prepuce amputation is carried out in U.S. style male circumcision surgery (most often via Gomco or Plastibell amputations), is not only immediately damaging to a newborn baby; it is also permanently altering and forever changing the adult male body, and impacts all future sexual partner(s) as well.


Above: Newborn boys in their normal intact state (left) and those who have had their prepuce amputated via circumcision (right). Top left = Plastibell. Bottom left = Gomco

Below: Adult men in their normal intact state (left) and others who had their prepuce amputated via infant circumcision (right) forcing the glans to adapt as an external organ: something it was never meant to be.


To learn more about the many purposes of the prepuce, see: Functions of the Foreskin and related articles linked within.

Today, approximately 250,000 men who were circumcised at birth are restoring some of what was lost. If you are one of these men, you are not alone. Find resources and discuss the topic with other men via articles, sites, organizations and options for foreskin restoration here.













Intact Celebrities

Intact or Circumcised: Penis Glans (head) in the Adult Male
(work safe version)

Q&A For Intact Men


We receive a large volume of mail from parents wondering what to tell their intact son as he grows up and becomes fully retractable on his own. Thanks to the efforts of several intact groups, parents today are getting the message: "DON'T RETRACT! Only Clean What is Seen! Wipe like a finger - outside only - warm water," as they care for their babies. But when these babies grow up, U.S. parents still do not have a good go-to source for information on how to discuss this topic with sons who may be the first intact men in several generations of their family. There is a lost shared wisdom about the intact body and how to gently and properly care for it.

In addition, there are no 'development' or 'sex ed' books in the U.S. that treats the intact male body as fully normal and not 'dirty' -- even those books that present intact male anatomy still have a paragraph or two somewhere within their covers that would lead intact boys to think they were more 'at risk' or more in need of 'cleaning' than their non-intact counterparts.

As such, we are working on a series of items geared specifically for boys growing up and the parents who want to know, "What do I say to him?!" If you are a parent of intact sons, or are a man (of any age) who has grown up intact, and you'd like to share any aspect of your story to benefit these young men today, or their parents, please drop us a note. We would love to hear your voice in response to some of the questions below as well. They will be compiled with others' answers, and used anonymously/first name or pseudonym only (depending on the respondent's preference) to lend insight into what all the other guys are doing...

Responses, questions or personal stories may be sent to:  SavingSons@gmail.com


1) How do you 'clean'? Be as specific as you like. It will help others who are new to all things intact.


2) If you remember bath time as a child, was there anything your parents said/did not say or do/not do that was specific to your intact state?


3) What would you tell parents who have an intact boy and would like to know what to do after he is retracting on his own?


4) What would you suggest that parents say/not say to their child as he reaches his pre-teen years/puberty?


5) Is there a foreskin-friendly/intact-friendly book for boys growing up that you know of?


6) Any other comments that would be useful to a generation of U.S. parents raising intact sons for the first time?


Thank you for sharing and helping out a new generation of young men!


~~~~

Doctors Who Circumcise: Breaking the Law in Britain

Via Men's Health Forum

Supporters of genital autonomy have argued that the practice of male genital cutting (circumcision) could be illegal on minors under the Offences Against the Person Act and have critiqued the British Medical Association's position on the circumcision surgery as 'unethical.'

Earlier this month, Men Do Complain (MDC) and NORM-UK chairman, Dr. John Warren, and colleagues (pictured above) delivered an open letter to the BMA arguing that, "A child who has no disease, no injury or no dangerous abnormality has no need of any type of treatment or irreversible surgery" and that to carry it out just to please the parents "violates the autonomy of children."

The letter goes on to say that "Any surgery that is performed without the patient’s personal consent and without therapeutic need is clearly an assault. Any cut made without consent or therapeutic need 'that breaks the continuity of the skin' is a wounding under the (Offences Against the Person) Act 1861."

All other genital touching is vigorously prosecuted under British law.

Richard Dunker of MDC said, "The current attitude of the medical authorities toward circumcision is inappropriate in an era where children’s individual rights are increasingly recognised. Adults have a duty of care and responsibility to nurture their children, but this does not extend to a power to authorise non-therapeutic removal of a body part, however trivial an individual doctor may consider it to be."

Dunker continues, "It is hard to see how protecting children from unnecessary genital surgery is not in the public interest when prosecutions for touching the genitals of children are vigorously pursued. In a non-therapeutic circumcision such touching is done with impunity."



The rate of genital cutting in Britain is significantly lower than in the United States (where the CDC reported 32% of baby boys born in 2009 were circumcised).

Additional information on the prepuce (foreskin), intact care, and circumcision at: Are You Fully Informed? 


~~~~
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...