tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-152955260192290179.post5646639555501761399..comments2024-01-13T20:01:46.765-05:00Comments on Saving Our Sons: Circumcision to Reduce Men's Sexual PleasureUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-152955260192290179.post-43486159676979034712015-04-26T01:50:37.004-04:002015-04-26T01:50:37.004-04:00I am a woman who has been with both uncircumcised ...I am a woman who has been with both uncircumcised and circumcised.The greatest distinction for me in any event is that it is FAR less demanding to give hand jobs to men who are uncircumcised.With a foreskin,you need to stress considerably less over teasing the penis while giving a hand work.I haven't noticed much,if any distinction,in oral sex or penetrative sex between men who are circumcised and the individuals who are most certainly not.Notwithstanding,I have noticed that the heads of uncircumcised penises have a tendency to get more swollen and engorged with blood than the heads of circumcised penises.The more engorged, the more sensations.<br /><br />~Sylvia Powell.tadalafil onlinehttp://www.truemenspower.com/tadalafil.htmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-152955260192290179.post-21940187408335091772014-07-06T14:27:39.348-04:002014-07-06T14:27:39.348-04:00Holy crap, I never even thought about this. You ar...Holy crap, I never even thought about this. You are totaly right about condoms and circ!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-152955260192290179.post-44517176004782877892014-01-22T11:12:23.907-05:002014-01-22T11:12:23.907-05:00Before WWII, it was commonly believed that the poo...Before WWII, it was commonly believed that the poor were poor because they had more children than they could afford. And poor wives became pregnant too often, because poor husbands demanded sex too often. And men demanded sex too often because the tips of their penises were too sensitive, making sex too much fun. And the tip of the penis was too sensitive, because of the way God/evolution had designed it. And the foreskin was a crucial player in that design: it preserved the sensitivity of the glans, and was a sensitive structure in its own right.<br />The same argument was repeated with regard to conception out of wedlock, prostitution and STDs.<br />Ergo, circumcise boys and solve a whole host of social problems and moral evils in one fell swoop.<br /><br />People, I am a baby boomer from the midwest. I came of age in what I call the Empire of the Bald Penis. Circumcision did not prevent the baby boom. Did not prevent the emergence of respectable porn, starting with Playboy magazine. Prostitution, escort services and call girls were rife. My mother has told me that when she escorted my father to business banquets, drunken married EVPs tried to press their hotel room keys into her hand. My European mother emigrated to the USA as a young adult. She was shocked to discover the lewdness of American life behind a heavy coating of hypocrisy. Decades later, I noticed that all forms of commercialised lewdness, other than time honoured prostitution, are American in origin.<br /><br />Many of the children in my generation were adopted, proof of a steady level of conceptions out of wedlock. There was a common fear of gonnorea. As time went by, a whole raft of new STDs came to be talked about: herpes, warts, chlamydia, HPV and AIDS. The fact that we were all circumcised did nothing at all to blunt wave after wave of the STD epidemic around us.<br /><br />A lot of the social and moral evils I am touching on here can be largely prevented via condom use. Which poses the evident question: where does resistance to condom use come from? And I submit that a major candidate answer is staring us all in the face: circumcision. If condom + no foreskin = sex that abrades women, or that is simply too dull for words, then circumcision is a vast foot-shooting exercise. I am astounded that there are no studies of the possible correlation between condom use and circ status.roger desmoulinsnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-152955260192290179.post-23750761921419301102014-01-19T22:09:34.629-05:002014-01-19T22:09:34.629-05:00The stupidity of "Cockshut" was matched ...The stupidity of "Cockshut" was matched only by his arrogance. He was actually saying "I know better than God"!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-152955260192290179.post-7578490160039117752014-01-19T22:04:37.109-05:002014-01-19T22:04:37.109-05:00Perhaps they should have not included it, or at le...Perhaps they should have not included it, or at least not used his name. Seeing it will probably mislead some people into thinking that the whole article is a satire.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-152955260192290179.post-20805802479368419412012-07-08T17:04:00.035-04:002012-07-08T17:04:00.035-04:00That last quote is from Dr....Cockshut? Wow.That last quote is from Dr....Cockshut? Wow.Midgehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13606380309255045993noreply@blogger.com